Coast Guard Plagued by Breakdowns

From my clip files….

Coast Guard plagued by breakdowns

By Mimi Hall, USA TODAY

July 06, 2005

WASHINGTON – The Coast Guard’s ships, planes and helicopters are breaking down at record rates, which may threaten the service’s ability to carry out its post-9/11 mission of protecting ports and waterways against terrorism.

Some of the Coast Guard’s ships are more than 50 years old, well beyond the recommended age for replacement.

Key members of Congress, maritime security experts and a former top Homeland Security Department official say that the fleet is failing and that plans to replace the Coast Guard’s 88 aging cutters and 186 aircraft over the next 20 years should be accelerated.

“This nation must understand the dire situation in which the Coast Guard now finds itself,” says Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, chairwoman of a Senate Coast Guard subcommittee. She favors replacing the Coast Guard’s “deepwater” fleet – the ships and aircraft capable of operating far offshore – over 10 to 15 years.

Former Coast Guard commandant and Homeland Security deputy secretary James Loy says “the stakes are simply too high in the post-9/11 environment” to continue to allow the Coast Guard’s aging equipment to continue to deteriorate. Some ships are more than 50 years old, well beyond the recommended age for replacement.

The Bush administration wants to increase the amount of time it will take to replace a fleet that’s among the oldest on the globe – older even than fleets owned by nations such as Algeria and Pakistan. The “deepwater” replacement program, conceived in 1998 as a $20 billion, 20-year plan to replace the fleet, could be increased to 25 years under a White House plan.

The strategy would save the government money in the short term. The White House budget office declined to comment.

Snowe calls the idea a “violation of common sense” amid mounting concern that terrorists will try to sneak weapons of mass destruction into the USA through a port.

Adm. Thomas Collins, commandant of the Coast Guard, says he supports the White House plan and has enough refurbished equipment to operate the fleet.

But this month, he told Congress his equipment is failing at unacceptable rates:

. In fiscal 2004, the engines on the Coast Guard’s 95 HH-65 helicopters suffered power losses at a rate of 329 per 100,000 flight hours, up from 63 per 100,000 flight hours in fiscal 2003. The comparable Federal Aviation Administration standard is 1 per 100,000 flight hours.

. There have been 23 hull breaches – holes that let in water – requiring emergency dry-dock repairs in the 49 110- and 123-foot patrol boats since 2001.

. Each of the dozen 378-foot cutters, most of which operate in the Pacific, suffers a significant engine or hydraulic or refrigeration system breakdown on every patrol.

. For all major cutters and patrol boats, the number of unscheduled maintenance days was 742 in fiscal 2004, up from 267 in fiscal 1999. The loss of cutter days in fiscal 2004 equated to losing 10% of the major fleet for an entire year.

Stephen Flynn, a maritime security expert and former Coast Guard officer, says the agency is “operating at the level, in many instances, of a Third World navy.”

The Coast Guard was moved into the Department of Homeland Security in 2003 and given primary responsibility for maritime security in addition to its regular duties. The added responsibilities include patrolling the nation’s361 ports and 95,000 miles of coastline, boarding and inspecting tens of thousands of cargo ships and recreational boats, and reviewing security at the nation’s commercial ports.

  • July 2005, huh? #$@#$*&(. Some things in Congress never change.
  • Justice Brother
    "CGBlog Plagued by Breakdowns"

    Source: www.coastguardreport.org

    Lesson Learned = Don't believe everything you read
  • I think this is why we need new toys like now, not yesterday or the decade before. It's a shame that the US Coast Guard is running equipment that should have been put out to pasture at least a decade ago.
  • Sea_Spook
    There is no "we" as far as you are concerned Nicky. You are not a Coastie.
  • Guest
    Hey, I'm an Aux and a tax paying citizen
  • Sea_Spook
    Having read your disturbing writings Nicky/Kamododragon, I'm not sure if the Coast Guard Auxiliary is very happy with you going around claming to be a member and misrepresenting them:

    http://forums.firehouse.com/showthread.php?t=88889

    http://www.thewatchdesk.com/forum/showthread.ph...

    Just go away Nicky, you have embarrased the Coast Guard and the Aux enough and nobody cares what you think about anything related to the service and its members.





  • Guest
    Here's the problem with Sea_Spook, he's a troll who's trolling for problems and trolling for a fight. He's doing the Arm Chair Coast Guard thing by saying what the coast guard should be doing from his Arm chair instead of actually doing the hard dirty work.

    The fact is Sea_Spook, is a troll and doesn't have any thing nice to say. It goes to show that Sea_Spook has no Backbone to put his REAL name or Real FACE in here. I think people like Sea_Spook is afraid to be a man up and put his Real Name in here. That's why people like Sea_Spook are just nothing but cowards and have no BACKBONE to put their real name and real face in here. They are just CHICKEN, a COWARD and not MAN enough to show their REAL name in here.
  • Sea_Spook
    Just referencing what you have been saying yourself in your own words Nicky. My only comment is that your threatening of others with violence while simultaneously misrepresenting what you do (to include that you are "stationed", that you have "deployed", that you have "rank", that you "train" cadets at the Coast Guard Academy, that you "protect" us all from "terrorist attacks" and hold the qualifications of "Aircrew, Observer, Boatcrew, Coxswain, Cutterman and Instructor.") and misleading the public on what role the Aux plays is a disgrace. You are not a Coastie, and I certainly do not have anything nice to say about the embarrassment you have caused the Coast Guard and the Aux.
  • Guest
    That's why Sea_Spookm your a Troll and you don't have the GUTS to post your real name behind the post. Your a coward and a loser. I bet you ain't even in the US Coast Guard for that matter.
  • Sea_Spook
    Nicky, so long as you, a non-Coastie who has lied, claimed to be something you are not and know you are not, threatened others with violence and posted all sorts of perverted sexual content interspaced with Coast Guard material to the grave embarrassment of the Coast Guard and the Coast Guard Aux wants to insert yourself into Coast Guard discussions, I will address how you have no business here based on your offensive behavior is and how much you as a person are obviously out of sync with the service's Core Values. If you do not to hear feedback on how some of us do not welcome your presence based on your propensity to going around in public claiming to be things you are not and making actual Coasties look bad, stick your own site.
blog comments powered by Disqus